all work and no play... NOT

Ok, sorry for the delay, I'm late on my quota by 100%! Oh noes! Yeah, it seems there is less time in the day than I had planned for... you know, those 24 hours seem longer when you're bored right? Yeah, my days have been like thus:
7:30 - Awaken and all that waking entails
8:30 - Get to work
9:00 - Begin 8 hours of doing the following cycle:

1. Be confused on code
   
2. Figure out why confusion is occurring
   
3. Realize what problem is creating the confusion
4. Still be confused because despite knowing what's causing the problem... it's still a problem and therefore isn't readily solvable
5. Think I'm a genius because I figure out a way to solve said problem
6. Realize I'm not a genius because I have to figure out how to implement the solution
7. Code compiles! (After 50million errors, mainly syntax, of course)
8. Code does not work as intended - pretty standard
9. Figure out why code doesn't work.
10. Repeat steps 1-7 until code works as intended.
11. Be excited.
12. Get new task. Repeat 1-10.

5:00 - Go home
5:30 - Make dinner/Microwave leftovers - Consume food
6:30 - Finally free time
9:30 - Phone special someone
11:00 - Sleep

So that leaves me with oh.. 3 hours of fun time, give or take... and the past few days, one of the housemates has been asking "Wanna play something?" - how can I refuse? So we boot up the 360, and play something ... that can take up to 3 hours ... we all know how games just eat up time right?

*Sigh, so yeah... I guess weekdays won't allow me to do the post every 2 days. But I guess I'll try to anyway. Sorry for the delay, but then again, why do I need to be sorry? Just kidding! I think... something like that

So while I'm on the subject of house mate, well he's a coworker too, and at work it's me him and another coworker in one room. We have quite the parties in there as well. So, one guy decides to ask. What percentage is "most"? He says 50+%, housemate says 75+%,..... what do I think?
I think 66+%. But then in order to disprove the housemate he says, how many people would be most out of 3 people: 2 right? So that's above 50%. I'm thinking, I'm pretty dead on! And I'm also thinking: it's also possible that, out of 4 people, most would be 3... and therefore both 50% dude and me would be wrong. Luckily that didn't come up. Still... see how semantics create such conflicts! *sigh... Housemate's argument was, if you took a poll of a million people and someone said most people voted pro-issue, 500,001 people would not be what you think of. Oh how diligent workers we are!

Also at work, I was peeing right? Yes in the restroom, where else? And I was studying the shape of the urinal - well what else are you supposed to be looking at when you're peeing? But anyway... Sorry ladies, if you're missin' out on the visuals, I'll put in a picture... Sometimes, they put those plastic things at the bottom of the urinal - I guess so that the "freshener" they put in there doesn't go down the drain as well (even though, the fresheners just smell like bathroom...or do the bathrooms smell like the fresheners, who knows)... But I was thinking.. that's really retarded, isn't the point of going to the bathroom in a toilet/urinal to keep from making a mess? Envision you're holding a hose, and you're aiming the water into a bucket (I'm steering away from pee atm, just so it isn't awkward). Now, somebody puts a plastic sheet with holes in it over the bucket... they must think, hey it has holes in it! water will still get through. BUT WTF, the water from the hose (while mostly (at least 66%) goes into the bucket), some of it splashes. WHY WOULD YOU PUT THAT THERE?!!? But then I thought, wait a second, why do urinals have walls like they do... I mean, it's like you're peeing against a wall - which also would surely cause splashback. (sick isn't it?)

So I propose they should reassess the shape of a urinal. Maybe make it more rounded in, so that when water hits it, it will not bounce back... you know, maybe a warped parabola - You know how in a parabola when a vector strikes it and bounces, all vectors will converge at some central thing... I forget what the term is called... the focus? I dunno, anyway, they should make urinals into a unique parabola where if someone would chance to pee straight in (And I hope no one *ever* does this on a current generation urinal) the stream will ricochet, however it will converge to the drain, and not the user. Guys, you'll probably know exactly what I'm talking about. Ladies, here's a picture of a urinal with those stupid plastic drain covers.


Credit on the image goes to some blog by Radley Balko on www.reason.com - I found it using Google Image search...

The curve on this urinal isn't so bad, but there are others that pretty much look like you're peeing against a wall... Anyway, I think that's enough for now... Or rather, I'm tired of typing... I still have some topics in mind, so look foward to:
"The Future" (as a topic, not as .. nvm)
and "Chewing Gum"
and more as I think of random stuff in my boredom...